Reactify Solutions
HandbooksJev decision modelLimits, pricing & weak spots

Limits, pricing, and weak spots

The current Jev model, its context limits, rate limits, and price, plus the short list of things it does badly. One page to check before you ship.

jev-1.13.0Last reviewed September 23, 2026
In one minute
  • Current model: jev-1.13.0. The alias jev-latest points to it.
  • 64k tokens per request in total. Output tokens are free.
  • $0.042 per million input tokens on TypeSafe directly.
  • Text only, best in English, 255 options max per Choice, 2 to 10 levels per Score.
  • It does not write text, do math, or compare dates well.

The model

NamePoints toNotes
jev-latestjev-1.13.0Stable, the SDK default
jev-previewjev-1.13.0Same model for now
jev-1.13.0itselfPin this in production so upgrades do not surprise you

Jev is not fine-tuned per customer. You shape its behavior through state, instructions, and criteria. TypeSafe says it does not train on customer requests, and zero data retention is available for enterprise.

Limits

LimitValue
Context per request64k tokens (state plus all questions)
State plus longest question32k tokens
Choice optionsup to 255
Score levels2 to 10
Requests1,200 per minute
Throughput250,000 tokens per second
InputText only: string, JSON object, or array

Rate limits were being adjusted during launch, so check the models page if you plan for high volume.

Speed and price

  • Latency: 70 to 500 ms end to end.
  • Price: $0.042 per million input tokens. Output is free.
  • TypeSafe's own benchmark: up to 200 times faster and 400 times cheaper than frontier chat models on decision tasks. Treat that as the best case, and measure on your own workload.
Prices differ by channel

The number above is TypeSafe's direct price. Gateways like Vercel AI Gateway, OpenRouter, and Cloudflare set their own. Some third-party guides also list older or different numbers, so check the page for the channel you actually use.

Weak spots

From TypeSafe's own list for jev-1.13:

Weak spotWhat to do instead
Reads questions literallyWrite the exact condition in instructions
Math and countingDo it in code
DatesParse and compare in code
Double negatives, long chains of logicAsk a direct, single-step question
Long, noisy stateOnly send what the question needs
Adversarial inputTest with hostile examples, use explicit criteria
Instructions that conflict with criteriaMake them say the same thing
Opposite questions do not sum to 1Ask one version of each question
Generating textUse an LLM, or turn extraction into a bounded Choice
Where this page's facts come from

TypeSafe's models page, state docs, jev-1.13 known issues, and the launch post for the benchmark numbers.

Last reviewed September 23, 2026 · verified against TypeSafe AI models page and jev-1.13 known issues, Sep 2026